![]()
![]()
![]()
Gehl: Eliminating corporate net worth tax sends needed dollars out of Georgia
By Sarah Beth Gehl
Why should Georgians give corporations — including many headquartered in other states and countries — a special tax break during a recession when the state cannot afford to pay for our schools, state parks, courts, and child abuse protection workers, among many, many other vital services?
That is just what House Bills 998 and 1023 propose to do. HB 1023 passed the House Small Business Development and Job Creation Committee, while HB 998 remains in the House Ways and Means Committee.
More than half of corporations pay just the minimum for the corporate net worth tax —only $10. Georgia faces a $4.6 billion deficit and our recovery is going slowly: Every single dollar counts, including the $30 million from this tax.
There is no evidence that ending this tax will incite businesses to come to Georgia, nor make up for the lost revenue. If the tax is a nuisance for businesses, then lawmakers should make common sense reforms, such as changing to a single sales apportionment formula to match the corporate income tax returns.
However, if lawmakers want to eliminate the corporate net worth tax entirely, they should do so responsibly. Georgia must have a balanced budget; therefore, if lawmakers enact this tax break, they should balance it with a $30 million increase in revenue. Or, perhaps, they should cut special interest business tax breaks worth $30 million already in the tax code to offset the lost revenues.
Better yet, lawmakers should tackle the main problem and comprehensively reform the tax system to ensure adequate funds for our public services, improve fairness among taxpayers, ease administration, and increase the state’s financial stability.
• Sarah Beth Gehl is the deputy director of the Georgia Budget and Policy Institute, an independent, nonpartisan think tank that analyzes the state budget to inspire informed debate and responsible decision-making.
Her credentials and work
Submitted by Jeff Snowden (not verified) on Fri, 02/26/2010 - 2:15pm.Her credentials and work speak for her point of view and yes, I do disagree with this policy assessment. And if making sure programs are "worth the investment" is the GBPI's aim, maybe the people that fund them should ask if they're getting what they're paying for.By the way, who does fund them?
Why should Georgia take the
Submitted by Jeff Snowden (not verified) on Fri, 02/26/2010 - 12:06pm.Why should Georgia take the yoke off employers in tough times? This really deserves an answer? Incentives that make the conducting of business easier work. That's why Coca Cola is headquarterd in Georgia but incorporated in Delaware. It's why so many companies are moving major operations to Belgium.However, I completely agree with you on the balanced budget- just perhaps not in a way you'll like. Lawmakers should go through the entire goverment with a nit comb and remove every worthless make-work program that fails to show true value for Georgians.Businesses are not the enemy and professional readers of talking points are not the answer.
Well ...
Submitted by Johnathan McGinty on Fri, 02/26/2010 - 12:16pm.... Gehl's no 'talking-point reader' by any means. You can disagree with her policy assessments, but her credentials and work speak for themselves. In fact, your claim that the government should evaluate its programs and make sure they are worth the investment is a central component of GBPI's call for reform through the evaulation of tax credits and programming options.